What if I have a question that is not answered here or in the manual? Installation Questions. How is dms installed? Should AMBERHOME be. This tutorial introduces DOCK Score in DOCK6 and describes the preparation of input Please see the DOCK6 manual for futher details. If you have installed DOCK6, this script can be found in the bin directory. . To select other options, please read the DOCK 6 Manual.

Author: Jujora Bragor
Country: Belize
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 4 February 2004
Pages: 65
PDF File Size: 7.4 Mb
ePub File Size: 19.93 Mb
ISBN: 238-1-17410-578-3
Downloads: 68580
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vunos

DOCK 6: Impact of New Features and Current Docking Performance

With the current protocols, it is important to elaborate that docking may only be able to discriminate between strong and weak binders in cases where mutations directly interact with the ligand; docking should not be expected to be sensitive to mutations with indirect effects, including solvation or allosteric manuao, for example.

To correct this behavior we modified the internal energy function to employ solely the repulsive van der Waals term, and to function at all stages of growth. Finally, a maximum number of scored conformers were retained for examination, following best-first clustering with a 2. Counterintuitively, we observed an increase in docking success Of the eight streptavidin ligands Figure 12bfive are biotin or a biotin derivative [ 83 — 86 ] and three are azobenzene analogs.

When docking to all other receptors, we find 19 out of non-viable pairings, and a Ongoing work in our laboratory, as well as other groups, includes evaluating dock66 to effectively model receptor conformational variability or ensembles during docking.

DOCK tutorial with Streptavidin – Rizzo_Lab

Again the best pose generated Crystal structure pose shown as light gray sticks, and partially grown conformers shown as magenta sticks. An alternative way to generate the “monotonic” receptor file is to open the receptor. It is important to emphasize that the correlation of low success rates with faster run times nanual indicates undersampling caused by early termination of docking calculations.


Docking Forensic Tools Careful analysis of the docking process and outcomes, particularly the docking failures, is dockk6 means doci6 discovering problems in or limitations of the DOCK codebase, input parameters, or structure preparation protocols.

This program can either be used interactively, or an input file can be fed in, just like the showbox program. It is important to create a grid and dock the ligand to the correct location in the protein.

To facilitate colored visualization for identical poses, molecules were offset 0. This will not cause any trouble in most of the time, but you may want to notice this in dodk6 circumstances, for example when you want to execute some.

One likely reason for such high scoring failure rates is the presence of metal ions in the binding site, as is the case for carbonic anhydrase and matrix metalloproteinase. One of the problems one may encounter with grid creation is the sampling location for ligand binding.

As expected, RMSD differences for max 3 anchors vs. First, the new footprint similarity scoring function [ 7276 ] is an effective method for characterizing and quantifying ligand binding on a per-residue basis Figure S1, Table S1. The RGD protocol shows an approximately linear increase in docking run time as ligand flexibility increases, as expected, and the average docking run xock6 for ligands of 17 or fewer rotatable bonds is three minutes or less.

However, upon close examination, this practice did not always prevent significant internal ligand clashes from forming during anchor-and-grow conformational sampling. Analogous to the pose reproduction outcomes, cross-docking outcomes are categorized as success bluescoring failure greenand sampling failure redwith the addition of non-viable pairings gray, see Methods and Details.

Regarding the impact of new features and algorithms, a modified internal energy function Figure 5Table 1 improves overall success rates by removing unphysical ligand geometries from the population early during growth. Keep most answers as the default values. Find articles by Trent E.


Then, a small number of iterations of energy minimization are performed typically 10 to 50prior to a full energy minimization with the standard degrees of freedom. Finally, one can attempt to find proteins with similar sequence and determine where their ligand binding sites are, and then pick the binding site in the protein you are docking manuwl using that information.

2012 DOCK tutorial with Streptavidin

The new RMSD metric contributes to the accurate reporting of DOCK successes and failures Figure S2and it has also been co-opted to serve as a scoring function or applied to molecular dynamics simulations. Paths requiring specification are listed below:. We can see the difference between the two files. This dramatically improves docking proficiency compared to using no internal energy functionas well as overall sampling. Cross-docking Methods The second mnual experiment, cross-docking, is an additional method for evaluating the pose reproduction ability of docking programs under different conditions.

One strategy for such cases is to resolve the clash by minor adjustment of the newly-added torsion angle without vock6 any other part of the molecule that already has a favorable interaction with the protein e. Note that the above specification will tell the program to load the 1DF8. The effectiveness of DOCK is demonstrated in pose reproduction, cross-docking picturedand enrichment experiments to systems that are of interest as drug targets.


Find articles by Robert C.