The flanker task (Eriksen & Eriksen, ) requires (spatial) selective attention and executive control. In this task, irrelevant stimuli have to be inhibited in order to. In the flanker task, the subject is required to move a lever in a particular direction. Which direction is required in condition B? a) Left b) Right. Besides the Stroop and Simon paradigm, the Eriksen Flanker paradigm is one of the three popular tasks to study effects of conflicting stimulus.

Author: Nikokree Kizshura
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Career
Published (Last): 9 October 2008
Pages: 429
PDF File Size: 3.77 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.36 Mb
ISBN: 250-9-76895-765-5
Downloads: 82157
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vikus

Subjects were instructed to make directional responses to certain letters, for example a right response could be associated to the letters H and Kand a left response to S and C.

In cognitive psychologythe Eriksen flanker task is a set of response inhibition tests used to assess the ability to suppress responses that are inappropriate in a particular context. Sequential Effects in the Flanker Task”.

Eriksen flanker task

The flankers could be arrows pointing in the same direction as the target flankeg the opposite direction incongruent or squares neutral.

In the original test tazk by Eriksen and Eriksen inletter stimuli were used. Some results and methodological considerations”. Languages Polski Edit links. Earlier work had used visual search[9] but because these tasks involve an active tassk of the environment to identify the target stimulus, this experimental design made it difficult to separate the effects of distraction from the effects of the search process.

The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. InCongruent — Congruent response conflict Shifting: In this example, you will see 5 letters appear above the fixation point, but you must only respond to the central letter which is above the fixation point. Effects of noise letters upon identification of a target letter in a non-search task. Eriksenwho first published the task inand also for the flanker stimuli that surround the target.

It is observed to be more active in response to processing incongruent stimuli than congruent stimuli. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.


The letters X and C need to be responded to with the A button of your keyboard.

Eriksen flanker task – Wikipedia

The study used an on-the-road driving tests, and several laboratory tests including the letter version of the Eriksen task to assess the effects of two antihistamines and yask on driving skills. In this task, you need to respond with the A or L key of your keyboard.

Just as with the Eriksen Flanker Task, the response time and accuracy of congruent words is better than those of incongruent words. The basic effect is that when you need to respond to stimuli “flanked” by irrelevant stimuli, the irrelevant stimuli can still affect your response.

Click here to run a demo of the flanker task. Incongruent The flanker stimuli map to a different response than the target stimulus. Another possibility is to use a natural mapping, with arrows as stimuli. There are three different types of conflict tasks that research has been largely focused on, one of these being the Eriksen Flanker Task. They proposed a continuous flow model of perception in which information is processed in parallel for different stimulus elements, and accumulates over time until sufficient information is available to determine a response.

These examples all use an arbitrary mapping between the stimulus and the response. A direct comparison of two competing accounts”. In the flanker paradigm, the position of the target is always known—there is no search process. The three attentional networks: Both alcohol and the antihistamine cetirizine impaired performance in the test measures, and their effects were additive.

If you have a PsyToolkit account, you can upload the zipfile directly to your PsyToolkit account. This page was last edited on 3 Decemberat Perception and Psychophysics, 16 Like most of the paradigms in this library, it is popular and there are many variants of the original. Journal of Experimental Psychology.

A variety of factors have been shown to affect subject’s performance on flanker tasks. Pages with DOIs inactive since Due to this, inferences and predictions about one task have been made by theorists based on the published findings in a different task.

To measure how conflicting information affects choice response speed, different conditions are introduced:.


Cognitive tests: Eriksen flanker test

Then, that measured conflict is used to enhance the amount of control the participant has on the next trial. Meaning of the columns in the output datafile. In this task, the stimulus, either a word, letter, or symbol, is shown on the right or left side of the computer screen. If there is a mismatch between the flanking sriksen their response and the response required by the central letter, we speak of a “incongruent” or “incompatible” condition.

Curiously, lowering serotonin levels via acute tryptophan depletion does not affect performance on a flanker task or corresponding EEG readings, but does alter cardiac response to incongruent stimuli, suggesting dissociation between cardiac and electro-cortical responses taek errors and feedback when measuring cognitive flexibility.

Tassk addition, costs of shifting instructions may be studied by asking the subject to switch focus between central and flanker flan,er depending on a cue. Development of attentional networks in childhood. Acute administration of antihistamine or alcohol severely impairs CRT in test measures, a deficit which Ramaekers et al.

British Journal of Psychiatry. Various psychiatric and neurological conditions also affect performance on flanker tasks. The non-sedating antihistamine loratidine had no effect on any of the measures studied.

The participant is instructed to press the right or left button based on the content of the stimulus rather than its location. Nonetheless interference still occurs, so it can be studied independently of search mechanisms. Retrieved from ” https: In PsyToolkit, the data output file is simply a textfile. Conflict scores are computed by subtracting the faster condition from the slower condition flankef each of the attention concepts:.

Besides the Stroop and Simon paradigm, the Eriksen Flanker paradigm is eruksen of the three popular tasks to study effects of conflicting stimulus information.