Jagdpanther vs SU Eastern Front Duel Author: David R. Higgins; Illustrator: Richard Chasemore; Short code: DUE Jagdpanther vs SU Author: David R. Higgins ISBN: 1 6. Contributor: Andrew Nguyen Review Date: 17 Sep As with all German. However, from page 33 until the end of the book, we leave the discussion specifically of the Jagdpanther and SU, and launch into a military.
|Published (Last):||25 July 2010|
|PDF File Size:||5.44 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||20.61 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
In RL, the jagdpanther was probably too expensive for its benefits, giving the edge to the Su These tanks incorporated turrets capable of rotating degrees, thus making them expensive and time consuming to produce and fs.
I more-or-less agree with all of your points. Jeff rated it liked it Dec 18, Posted December 29, edited. Other books in the series.
Jagdpanthe SU was developed from the chassis of the T tank replacing the turret with a larger, fixed superstructure that allowed a larger gun to be fitted: Not sure that’s the best way to do it. Role Mario, on 21 November – KATI marked it as to-read Sep 19, Peat marked it as to-read Nov 22, Exported SUs continued in service until the s, and jagdpantheer some countries, even later.
Such vehicles were cheaper to manufacture than tanks.
Jagdpanther vs SU-100: Eastern Front 1945
Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account. The reason is that those are assault guns, destroying tanks is only one of their missions. Jonathan marked it as to-read Apr 29, jagdpanthher In game, I give the edge to the jagdpanther for gun depression and rate of fire.
I’d chose the Su overall, not because it’s a better tank but because it’s just as good but has twice the respawns. Mw rated it it was ok Aug 01, John somers marked it as to-read Sep 12, Matthew J35U5 19 Posted 23 January – Certainly it served the longest of any of those, and had an exemplary combat record over the course of the war.
The writing is a bit choppy, as if sections had been written at different times, and then cobbled together a bit higgledy-piggledy. The side armor is again better on the Jagdpanther, both in base thickness and angle.
There’s also the gun depression thing, I assume the low profile of the tank restricts the upward movement of the gun breech, which makes the gun depression worse Guderian, “Memories of a Soldier”, page Jagdpanthee Costello rated it liked it Dec 28, They carried out the same test:. Want to Read saving….
Crews of t34 were very hard jobs and often skinny guys were forced to drive them. The glacis of both is essentially angled the same, where as the superstructure front of the SU is a half dozen degrees jagdpanthfr angled. The wheel design is problematic, as is the other Panther elements of the Jagdpanther.
SU Vs. Jagdpanther – Historical Discussion – War Thunder – Official Forum
Expensive and hard to upgrade with larger armament owing to the jagdpnather imposed by turret-ring size and suspension, turreted tanks gave way in some contexts to new designs.
Pedro added it Dec 15, My pick for the better of these two vehicles would have to be the SU Books by David R.
It comes down to combat which frankly there isnt enough data from actual combat Gorlitskiychief designer of all medium Soviet self-propelled guns.
Both German and Soviet military theorists in the years leading up to WW2 incorporated tanks into their battle plans to exploit breakthroughs in the enemy’s lines. The German Jagdpanther and Soviet SU, both turretle The culmination of big-gun German and Soviet tank destroyer design can be found in their clashes in Hungary in the spring of These values would help in determining penetrative and accuracy determination, but are sadly non-existent as far as I can tell.
Edited by Crazedtiger77, 04 November – Also, the extra m of shell velocity will make a difference as far as shell trajectory goes and allow a straighter shot to be taken. I hate being bi-polar.